The mantle of the expert is a system for learning through the active
imagination and enquiry methodology. It
was developed by the educator Dorothy Heathcote. She sees the mantle of the
expert as “an active urgent, purposeful view
of learning, in which knowledge is to be operated on and not merely taken in.” (Heathcote & Bolton, 1996)
The mantle of the expert makes
the learners pretend as if they are the experts. Through the work the pupils do
they create an imaginary enterprise. They
then work on an imaginary job as if they were the real people in charge. This
project work creates opportunities for the children to explore the curriculum in
any subject. The “enterprise” part provides the
context for learning. This is good for teachers and pupils alike as the teacher
could bring together different areas of the curriculum, rather than trying to
teach them separately. It is a ‘drama’ based way of learning, this allows for
more imagination skills to be used as well as the classes developing ways to “see
through each other’s eyes” helping young people develop ownership over their
enterprise. (Mantleoftehexpert.com, 2014) The pupils are
motivated by the challenge and chance of making their enterprise work. They
also take great pride in their work. The mantle of the expert also allows the
pupils to get a hands on approach to learning and be fully involved in projects.
These projects give them a great idea of what they are studying in a very
memorable environment
The aim of
reducing subject boundaries resonates with the work of Dewey whose focus was to
involve learners in problem-solving. Having strong problem solving skills is a
great trait to work on and have for the future for these children who would
participate in the mantle of the expert.
The only
disadvantage I could think of Is that this may only be beneficial to children
who are not shy and want to have a hands on approach to learning, whilst some
children may well want to take a step back and not have such a lead role in the
enterprise. However, it could be possible that by giving these children a
specific task in the group (which is something that happens in this way of
learning) they can excel and their confidence can grow so they feel that their
opinions do matter and are valued.
I believe that both Heathcote and
Wenger share a concern that all learning has to be situated within a
recognisable scenario for the pupils but Heathcote creates her social context
in a way which tries to replicate the real world. Wenger and Heathcote share a
common concern that learning is too often separated from familiar normal life
and happens in a separate space, and that testing happens ‘out of context’ in
an atmosphere that discourages most collaborative work. (Wenger, 1998)

No comments:
Post a Comment